Information literacy in higher education: an action plan using soft systems methodology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v3i4.290

Keywords:

Information Literacy, Higher Education, Action Plan, Soft Systems Methodology, Pedagogical Project

Abstract

The process of technological, sociocultural, and economic globalization has required universities to adapt to new technologies, as well as changes in the pedagogical projects of undergraduate courses, with the aim of stimulating information literacy, media literacy, independent learning, and social responsibility, aiming to guarantee the dimensions: technical, aesthetics, ethics, and politics in higher education. This research used the method called 'Soft Systems Methodology', as it focuses on problematic situations involving various actors around the standards and categories of information literacy. For each category of information literacy, a problem situation to be explored was defined and an action plan was established. The objective is to develop an information literacy program in higher education that develops skills to access, find, evaluate, appropriate and use information, as well as develops skills to handle new technologies. The specific objectives: 1) include proposals for student independent learning, in addition to curricular subjects; 2) propose actions to encourage the appropriate use of information while preserving memory; 3) present practices to exercise citizenship with participation in decisions and social transformations. The information literacy program in higher education presents a possible action plan with suggestions for desirable changes, which can stimulate independent learning, social responsibility, and media literacy, in the technical, aesthetic, ethical and political dimensions of information literacy in higher education context.

References

American Association of School Librarians / Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998). Information power: building partnerships for learning. Chicago. 185p. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315028.pdf.

American Library Association (1989). Presidential Commitee on Information Literacy: final report. Washington.

Association of College and Research Libraries (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Chicago. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.

Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information literacy competence standards for higher education. Illinois. https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7668/ACRL%20Information%20Literacy%20Competency%20Standards%20for%20Higher%20Education.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley: Chichester.

Resolução CNE/CES 5/2021. Institui as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Administração. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 18 de outubro de 2021, Seção 1, p.47-48. http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=212931-rces005-21&category_slug=outubro-2021-pdf&Itemid=30192.

IFLA/UNESCO (2005). Diretrizes da IFLA/UNESCO para bibliotecas escolares. São Paulo. 28p. https://archive.ifla.org/VII/s11/pubs/SchoolLibraryGuidelines-pt_BR.pdf.

Society of College, National and University Libraries (2011). The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: Core model for higher education. London. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf.

UNESCO (2011). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Paris. 191p. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192971.

UNESCO (2008). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Paris. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/media_and_information_literacy_curriculum_for_teachers_en.pdf.

Vitorino, Elizete Vieira; Piantola, Daniela (2011). Dimensões da competência informacional. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.40, n.1, p.99-110, jan./abr. https://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1328/1507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652011000100008

Zurkowski, Paul (1974). The information service environment relationships and priorities. Washington: NCLIS. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf.

Published

2024-01-11

How to Cite

Teixeira, T. M. C., & Valentim, M. L. P. (2024). Information literacy in higher education: an action plan using soft systems methodology. Revista EDICIC, 3(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v3i4.290