The 2030 agenda indicators, information retrieval and relevance: diagnosis of voluntary national reviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v3i1.191Keywords:
Information Retrieval, Relevance, 2030 Agenda, Voluntary National Reviews, IndicatorsAbstract
The 2030 Agenda is a commitment made by leaders of 193 nation-states, and coordinated by the United Nations. There are 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets with indicators that indicate the metrics to be achieved. For recording the results, Information Retrieval is used to verify the relevant data. The general objective of this article is to map the Latin American and Caribbean nation-states signatories of the 2030 Agenda that presented voluntary reports for the demonstration of results. The method used for the research is bibliographic, as it presents theoretical records on relevance and Information Retrieval; and documental, by exploring the text of the global agenda and national and international research. As for the approach, it is qualitative, for evaluating and interpreting aspects of the literature and international and national documents, and quantitative, for presenting the list of reports of National Voluntary Reviews structured by year. In the results, the country that most stood out in the presentation of the National Voluntary Review was Uruguay with 4 (four) reports, followed by Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, and Mexico with 3 (three) reports; Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Dominican Republic with 2 (two) reports. As Brazil, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Cuba, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago and Venezuela submitted only 1 (one) report. Of the 33 nation-states, only 2 (two) did not report at all: Haiti and Saint Kitts and Nevis. The other 31 presented at least 1 (one) report. Therefore, it is the relevant data retrieved by a Nation-State due to the indicators that measure the quality of information and its commitment to the dictates of the United Nations document. In this way, the data that make up the indicators implement or not the goals that register whether the Sustainable Development Goals of a Nation-State are in progress, stagnant or in retrogression. It is important to highlight that the 2030 Agenda includes a roadmap for sustainable development, betting on a transformative agenda in social, economic, and environmental terms. In particular, the government of Uruguay has been committed to integrating environmental objectives and mitigation and adaptation to climate change into its economic policy decisions. It concludes that it is important for the governments of the Nation-States to build partnerships with public, private, academic, and civil society sectors for the recovery of information and consolidation of their relevant data. This joining of forces will enable the preparation of reports and, consequently, the promotion, dissemination and monitoring of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda by the United Nations systems. In addition to this fact, the governments of the Nation-States must commit themselves to the production of content and propositional critical analyzes for the presentation of the Voluntary National Reviews on their development, to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda.
References
Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentação. Londres: Crosby Lockwood.
Brasil (2017). Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão. Relatório Nacional Voluntário sobre os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean & United Nations Development Programme [2023?]. 2030 Agenda in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regional knowledge management platform. https://agenda2030lac.org/en/countries.
Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042
Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21261
Hjørland, B. (2001). Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 774-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1131.abs
Hjørland, B. & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in Information Science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(6), 400-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y
IBGE (2023). Indicadores Brasileiros para os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. https://odsbrasil.gov.br/relatorio/sintese.
Mooers, C. N. (1951). Zatocoding applied to mechanical organization of knowledge. American Documentation, 2(1), 20–32. DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090020107. 10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090020107
Rio+20 (2012). Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Sobre a Rio+20. http://www.rio20.gov.br/sobre_a_rio_mais_20.html.
Sachs, J. D. et al. (2021). Sustainable Development Report 2021: Includes the SDG Index and Dashboards - The Decade of Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2021/2021-sustainable-development-report.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992411
Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(13), 321-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260604
Saracevic, T. (2017). The Notion of Relevance in Information Science: Everybody knows what relevance is. But, what is it really? In: Marchionini, G. (Ed.). Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. San Raphael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02302-6
United Nations (2013). General Assembly. A/RES/67/290. Format and organizational aspects of the high-level political forum on sustainable development. Sixty-seventh session. 23 August 2013. https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/67/290.
United Nations (2015). General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/70/L.1. Seventieth session. 18 September 2015. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/L.1&referer=/english/&Lang=E.
United Nations (2017c). General Assembly. Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/71/313. Seventy-first session. 10 July 2017. https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/313.
United Nations (2021). High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. 2021 Voluntary National Reviews Synthesis Report. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/hlpf/2021.
United Nations (2022a). High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. 2022 Voluntary National Reviews Synthesis Report. https://hlpf.un.org/2022/vnrs.
United Nations (2022b). High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. Countries who have presented their Voluntary National Review. https://hlpf.un.org/countries?f%5B0%5D=year%3A2023.
United Nations (2023). High-Level Political Forum 2023. https://hlpf.un.org/2023.
United Nations (2017a). Statistical Commission. Report on the forty-eighth session. E/2017/24-E/CN.3/2017/35. 7-10 March 2017. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/48th-session/documents/Report-on-the-48th-session-of-the-statistical-commission-E.pdf.
United Nations (2017b). Statistical Commission. Report of the Inter-agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. E/CN.3/2017/2*. Forty-eighth session. 7-10 March 2017. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/48th-session/documents/2017-2-IAEG-SDGs-E.pdf.
United Nations (2020). Statistical Commission. Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. IAEG-SDG: Tier Classification for Global SDG Indicators. E/CN.3/2020/2*. Fifty-first session. 3–6 March 2020. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3847801?ln=es.
United Nations (2022c). Statistical Commission. Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. IAEG-SDG: Tier Classification for Global SDG Indicators, 9 June 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/Tier%20Classification%20of%20SDG%20Indicators_9%20Jun%202022_web.pdf.
Uruguai (2022). Presidencia. Informe Nacional Voluntario Uruguay 2022. https://hlpf.un.org/sites/default/files/vnrs/2022/VNR%202022%20Uruguay%20Report.pdf.
Vazquez, K. C. et al. [2022]. ABDE 2030 Plano de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Brasília, DF: Associação Brasileira de Desenvolvimento. https://abde.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Plano-ABDE-2030-de-Desenvolvimento-Sustentavel.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista EDICIC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Association holds the copyright of the texts it publishes and, therefore, adopts a Creative Commons License, CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/
You are free to:
- Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.