Communication, information and repertotory of action of social movements in Brazil and Germany: access to information and social participation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v3i2.259

Keywords:

Information, Communication, Social movements, Brazil, Germany

Abstract

Information and communication are key elements that empower individuals to actively engage in political and social life. Through the communication and information networks established by social movements, people gain access to knowledge, data, arguments, and perspectives that can influence their opinions, engagement, and actions. Considering the importance of information and communication for democracy and civic participation, this text explores the action repertoires of social movements and their relationship with citizenship and media systems, particularly the internet, reflecting on their political, social, and cultural practices. In its theoretical journey, the text presents a conceptual and relational approach to information, communication, and civic participation, encompassing a certain performative dimension of social movements, manifested in mobilization, organization, and articulation of these movements around their political and social objectives. In the partial results, examples from Brazil and Germany in this context are discussed. The study was developed following the methodological procedures prescribed in the Systematic Literature Review. National and international databases provided by the German university Technische Universität Dortmund, such as Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO, were consulted. The Capes Theses and Dissertations Portal and the libraries of Unesp, USP, and Unicamp, all Brazilian institutions, were also consulted. Searches focused on strategically selected topics in the areas of Communication, Sociology, and Information Science, prioritizing publications from the 2000s, with an emphasis on those from the 2010s, without disregarding classical works from earlier periods. In the end, 67 references were selected and their content was systematically organized: relevant information from each study (e.g., methods and results) was extracted and recorded systematically. Social movements bring a variety of perspectives and voices to public discourse. They represent interests and groups often excluded or marginalized, ensuring that democracy is inclusive and that a wide range of concerns is considered in policy formulation. They can encourage active citizen participation, involving citizens in activities such as protests, petitions, and political engagement. This strengthens democracy as citizens feel more connected and involved in the political process. The reflection on information, communication, and social movements presented in this study suggests that social movements are active political actors in the public sphere who, even though they may not engage with all sectors of society or with political power, are legitimate carriers of specific demands from social groups and work in favor of democracy through citizen practices. The communication and information networks established by them are essential to support the alternative public sphere and build the foundations of the movement itself, which leads us to understand that the relationship between social movements, information and communication is intimate and intense.

Author Biography

Caroline Kraus Luvizotto, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Doutora em Ciências Sociais pela Unesp - Universidade Estadual Paulista (2010). Pós-doutorado pela Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal (2020). Docente permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Unesp. Professora Visitante Sênior na Technische Universität Dortmund, Alemanha (2023). Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa Comunicação Midiática e Movimentos Sociais (ComMov).

References

Alonso, A. (2009). As teorias dos movimentos sociais: um balanço do debate. Lua Nova, 76 (1), 49-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452009000100003

Braga, J. L. (2012). Circuitos versus campos sociais. In. M. A. Mattos, J. Janotti Junior, N. Jacks, (orgs.) Mediação & Midiatização. Edufba. 31-54.

Bringel, B. (2012). Com, contra e para além de Charles Tilly: mudanças teóricas no estudo das ações coletivas e dos movimentos sociais. Sociologia & Antropologia, 2 (3), 43-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752012v233

Castells, M. (2013). Redes de indignação e esperança: movimentos sociais na era da internet. Zahar.

Darbishire, H. (2010). Proactive transparency: the future of the right to information? World Bank Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/25031

Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., & Karmasin, M. (2022). The global handbook of media accountability. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326943

Galvão, M. C. B., & Ricarte, I. L. M. (2019). Revisão sistemática da literatura: conceituação, produção e publicação. Logeion: Filosofia da Informação, 6 (1), 57-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73

Gohn, M. da G. (2008). O protagonismo da sociedade civil – movimentos sociais, ONGs e redes solidárias. Cortez.

Luvizotto, C. K. (2022). Comunicação Digital e Cidadania: A Atuação de Movimentos Sociais e Contramovimentos Durante a Pandemia de Covid-19. Revista Comunicação Midiática (Online), 17, 61-72. https://www2.faac.unesp.br/comunicacaomidiatica/index.php/CM/article/view/542.

Luvizotto, C. K., & Sena, K. E. R. (2022). Cidadania Digital e tecnologia em rede: entre comunicação, algoritmos e aplicativos cívicos. Liinc em Revista, 18 (2), e6070, 01-18. https://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/6070/5707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v18i2.6070

Luvizotto, C. K, Napolitano, C. J. & Trindade, A. C. (2020). A informação sobre a Democratização da Comunicação no blog do Intervozes na Revista da Carta Capital. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias de La Comunicación. 19 (1), 38-48. http://revista.pubalaic.org/index.php/alaic/article/view/637/641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55738/alaic.v19i34.637

Melucci, A. (1989). Um objetivo para os movimentos sociais? Lua Nova, São Paulo, 17 jun., 49-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451989000200004

Mounk, Y. (2019). O povo contra a democracia: por que nossa liberdade corre perigo e como salvá-la. Companhia das Letras.

Pinto, M. V., Aquino, E. L. de C., Rondon, T. Moraes Junior, C. A. de & Kogan, A. (2018). Desinformação em eleições: desequilíbrios acelerados pelas tecnologias. IT&E – Instituto Tecnologia e Equidade.

Recuero, R. (2012). Redes sociais na internet. Sulina.

Silva, M. K. & Pereira, M. M. (2020). Movimentos e contramovimentos sociais: o caráter relacional da conflitualidade social. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, 8 (20), 26-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.647

Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics. Cambrige University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973529

Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain. In. T. Mark, T. (Org.). Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Duke University Press.

Trindade, A. C. (2020). O potencial das fanpages dos movimentos sociais em prol da democratização da comunicação: Um estudo sobre a comunicação online do Intervozes e Fórum Nacional pela Democratização da Comunicação. [Mestrado em Comunicação. Unesp – Universidade Estadual Paulista].

Volpato, A. N. (2022). Estratégias de visibilidade de movimentos sociais da juventude na sociedade midiatizada. [Doutorado em Comunicação. Unesp – Universidade Estadual Paulista].

Volpato, A. N., Luvizotto, C. K. & Versuti, C. D. (2019). Visibilidade Como Estratégia, Estratégias de Visibilidade: Movimentos sociais contemporâneos na internet. Revista ECO-Pós. 22 (1), 352-383. https://revistaecopos.eco.ufrj.br/eco_pos/article/view/15992/pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-pos.v22i1.15992

Zanetti, L. A., Luvizotto, C. K., Nascimento, F. A., & Trindade, A. C. (2023). Mediatized Public Sphere and Journalism in Times of Algorithms, Polarization and Crisis of Democracy in Brazil. Social Sciences. 12 (4), 143-151. http://www.socialsciencesjournal.org/article/202/10.11648.j.ss.20231204.11.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Luvizotto, C. K. (2023). Communication, information and repertotory of action of social movements in Brazil and Germany: access to information and social participation. Revista EDICIC, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v3i2.259