Analysis of the perception of users in relation to the services offered by the hospital library in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62758/re.v2i2.101Keywords:
Libraries, Libraries, Medical, Use of Scientific Information for Health Decision Making, Librarians, Clinical Librarian, COVID-19Abstract
It addresses research carried out within the Hospital Library. The objective is to present the users' perception of the services offered by the hospital library in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic through research applied to the clinical staff in relation to the services provided in a Hospital library. The justification refers to the importance of understanding the use of the library by members of the medical team who attended or not patients with COVID-19 in a private hospital of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The methodology refers to quantitative-qualitative research using an online questionnaire prepared in Google Forms, conducted at the Library, located at Hospital Felício Rocho. In the semi-structured questionnaires composed of 13 questions, the Likert rating scale was used. The variables collected were: gender, age, specialty, computer knowledge, category of work in the clinical staff, evaluation and use of library services in the search for information about COVID-19. The questionnaires were applied between October 2020 and May 2021.Research participants were physicians and hospital residents. The research was approved by the local Ethics Committee. One hundred and seventy-one physicians and residents (71.2% of 240) who reported using library services. The most representative way of using the hospital library was face-to-face, corresponding to 141 (82.5%). However, the same user may have used the library services in more than one way. Regarding the frequency in which they seek information about health in other institutions, the majority 37.4% (64) said they do so occasionally. Regarding the question about satisfaction, the majority, representing 59.1% (101) answered being very satisfied. Regarding the use of services to obtain information about COVID-19, about 43.3% sought information about COVID-19. On the other hand, the most demanded services of the Hospital Library, the use of computers (31.6%), followed by access to a source of Evidence-Based Medicine (UpToDate®) (21.1%) stands out. Regarding the satisfaction of library services, with regard to the information obtained about COVID-19, 59.1% (101) responded being very satisfied and 38% (65) responded being satisfied. In the qualitative part of the research, the participants were asked, in the form of an open question, suggestions for improving the services of the Library and the main answers were: Provide free printing and copying service; Have environments for individual study and collective study; Prepare material on information sources; Make e-books available. Improve WiFi. We conclude that the users of the Hospital Library are satisfied with the services offered in the face of the pandemic. Suggestions for improvements will be important for the continuity and improvement of the Library. This study is important because it presents a scenario of performance of the Clinical Librarian in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to carry out future studies to analyze the information skills and training needed for Librarians in pandemic contexts.
References
Almeida, S. D. C. D., & Vianna, V. H. (2019). Uso da ferramenta virtual UpToDate como prática de aprendizagem de um curso de medicina. Ciência da Informação, 48(3).
Aquino, E. M., Silveira, I. H., Pescarini, J. M., Aquino, R., Souza-Filho, J. A. D., Rocha, A. D. S., ... & Lima, R. T. D. R. S. (2020). Social distancing measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic: potential impacts and challenges in Brazil. Ciencia & saude coletiva, 25, 2423-2446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.10502020
Arcari R, Lamb G. (1977). The librarian in clinical care. Hosp Med Staff.6(12),18-23.
Babbie, E. (1999). Métodos de pesquisas de Survey/Earl Babbie; tradução de Guilherme Cezarino–Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG. Aprender Tradução de: Survey research methods.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2022). COVID19:Painel Coronavírus. Atualizado em:06/10/2022 18:08. https://covid.saude.gov.br/
Cohen, J. (1988). The t test for measures. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 19-74.
Croda, J., Oliveira, W. K. D., Frutuoso, R. L., Mandetta, L. H., Baia-da-Silva, D. C., Brito-Sousa, J. D., ... & Lacerda, M. V. G. (2020). COVID-19 in Brazil: advantages of a socialized unified health system and preparation to contain cases. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0167-2020
Edwards, K.M., & Orenstein W. A.(2022). COVID-19: Vaccines.UpToDate. Filadélfia:Wolters Kluwer Health, This topic last updated: Sep 07, 2022.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/covid-19-vaccines?search=Coronavirus%20infection%20vacina&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1.
Hospital Felício Rocho.Home page.(2019).https://www.feliciorocho.org.br/.
Mcintosh, K., Hirsch, M.S.& Bloom, A. (2020a).Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Clinical features. UpToDate. Filadélfia:Wolters Kluwer Health .(Literature review current through: Oct 2020. This topic last updated: Oct 28, 2020): https://www.uptodate.com/contents/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-clinical-features. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24179/kbbbbc.2020-75703
Mcintosh, K.; Hirsch, M.S.; Bloom, A. (2020b). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Epidemiology, virology, and prevention. UpToDate. Filadélfia:Wolters Kluwer Health. (Literature review current through: Oct 2020. This topic last updated: Oct 28, 2020. Topic 126981 Version 63.0. 2020). https://www.uptodate.com/contents/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-epidemiology-virology-and-prevention.
Medical Library Association. (2022). Home page. Chicago: MLA. https://www.mlanet.org/
Niemi, M.E.K., Daly, M.J., & Ganna, A. (2022).The human genetic epidemiology of COVID-19. Nat Rev Genet 23, 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00478-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00478-5
Prudencio, D.S., & Rodrigues, J. C. (2020). Profissional de informação em saúde: perfis, atuações e outras discussões. Informação@ Profissões, 9(2), 116-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/2317-4390.2020v9n2p116
Resende, M.Â.F., Martins, L.L., Gouveia M.L.C. (2012).Memorial: Fundação Felice Rosso: 75 anos de Benemerência, 60 anos de Medicina. Belo Horizonte: Logos.
Souza, A. D. de. (2020). A Biblioteca do Centro de Estudos do Hospital Felício Rocho: um olhar para a atuação do bibliotecário clínico. Ciência da Informação em Revista, 7(3), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.28998/cirev.2020v7n3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28998/cirev.2020v7n3h
Souza, A.D. de, Cota, A., & Fernandes, M.R. (2020). The response of clinical medical librarians to the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study. Journal of EAHIL, 16(3), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.32384/jeahil16405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32384/jeahil16405
Souza, A. D. de, Fernandes, M. R., & Freire Junior, A. de. M. (2021). Atuação do Bibliotecário Clínico em tempos de pandemia da COVID-19. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, 17, 1-20.
UpToDate. (2022). Home page. Wolters Kluwer.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/search
Vergara, S. C. (2000). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa. 3.ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista EDICIC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Association holds the copyright of the texts it publishes and, therefore, adopts a Creative Commons License, CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/
You are free to:
- Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.