Collaboration of librarians in health research teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62758/re.305Keywords:
Culture of Collaboration, Research Partnership, Librarian, Health Research Team, SkillsAbstract
Introduction: Librarians have adopted strategies that reflect their professional relevance, incorporating their knowledge into research. Collaboration in health research projects, whether academic or clinical, is a developing objective. Objectives: To identify librarians' perceptions of their competencies regarding collaboration in health research teams (HRTs); to identify researchers' perceptions of librarians' competencies as collaborators in HRTs; to identify the competencies that librarians should possess to collaborate with HRTs; to draft a set of recommendations and/or guidelines for the training of librarians for collaboration with HRTs. Methods: Mixed methodology. The quantitative approach is based on a questionnaire about competency perceptions for a sample of researchers and librarians regarding collaboration with health research teams. The qualitative approach is based on a semi-structured interview about competency perceptions and perspectives on the librarian's contribution, conducted with health librarians and a selective sample of health researchers. Results: The participants' perception in the study points to a set of skills highly valued by researchers and which librarians possess: 1) skills that fall within the so-called core of the profession (selection of information resources, information research, citing and referencing, identification of predatory journals and publishers, etc.); 2) skills that librarians possess but acquired in a professional context (filtering research results, data migration, etc.). The study results allowed for the drafting of recommendations for the renewal of skills to be integrated into the training of health librarians. Conclusions: The existence of a permanent interaction of skills between librarians and researchers was demonstrated, and the result of the collaboration integrates a dialogue based on a balance between areas of knowledge and expertise.
References
Antunes, M. L. (2024). Colaboração de bibliotecários em equipas de investigação em saúde: Perceções, contributos e perspetivas. Dissertação de doutoramento, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Coimbra. https://hdl.handle.net/10316/118837
Basílio, N., Cardoso, S., Nunes, J. M., Laranjo, L., Antunes, M. L., & Heleno, B. (2018). Portuguese primary care physicians response rate in surveys: A systematic review. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 64(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.64.03.272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.64.03.272
Bernardo-Castro, S., Donato, H., Ferreira, L., & Sargento-Freitas, J. (2020). Permeability of the blood-brain barrier through the phases of ischaemic stroke and relation with clinical outcome: Protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 10(9), e039280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039280
Borrego, Á., & Pinfield, S. (2020). Librarians publishing in partnership with other researchers: Roles, motivations, benefits, and challenges. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 20(4), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0031
Campos, L., Costa, D., Donato, H., Nunes, B., & Cruz, E. B. (2023). Implementation of digital health in rural populations with chronic musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review protocol. PLoS ONE, 18(12), e0291638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291638
Cooper, I. D., & Crum, J. A. (2013). New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: A systematic review, 1990-2012. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008
Dudden, R. F., & Protzko, S. L. (2011). The systematic review team: Contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425
Folk, A. L. (2014). Librarians as authors in higher education and teaching and learning journals in the twenty-first century: An exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2013.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.12.001
Foster, M. J. (2015). An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: From expert search to project manager. Journal of EAHIL, 11(3), 3–7. http://ojs.eahil.eu/ojs/index.php/JEAHIL/article/view/52
Foutch, L. J. (2016). A new partner in the process: The role of a librarian on a faculty research team. Collaborative Librarianship, 8(82), 80–83
Jaguszewski, J. M., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Association for Research Libraries. http://www.arl.org/component/content/article/6/2893
Ketchum, A. M. (2017). The research life cycle and the health sciences librarian: Responding to change in scholarly communication. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.110
Laranjo, L., Ding, D., Heleno, B., Kocaballi, B., Quiroz, J. C., Tong, H. L., Chahwan, B., Neves, A. L., Gabarron, E., Dao, K. P., Rodrigues, D., Neves, G. C., Antunes, M. L., Coiera, E., & Bates, D. W. (2021). Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(8), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892
Lewis, D. W. (2007). A strategy for academic libraries in the first quarter of the 21st century. College & Research Libraries, 68(5), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.5.418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.5.418
Marques, P., Nunes, M., Antunes, M. L., Heleno, B., & Dias, S. (2020). Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women in Europe: A scoping review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01275-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01275-4
Otter, M. L., Wright, J. M., & King, N. V. (2017). Developing the librarians’ role in supporting grant applications and reducing waste in research: Outcomes from a literature review and survey in the NIHR Research Design Service. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2–3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1330219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1330219
Simmons-Welburn, J., Donovan, G., & Bender, L. (2008). Transforming the library: The case for libraries to end incremental measures and solve problems for their campuses now. Library Administration & Management, 22(3), 130–134
Spencer, A. J., & Eldredge, J. D. (2018). Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: A scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.82
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista EDICIC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Association holds the copyright of the texts it publishes and, therefore, adopts a Creative Commons License, CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/
You are free to:
- Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
